MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138249341 · doi:10.3233/fi-2011-538

On the Regularity of Iterated Hairpin Completion of a Single Word

2011· article· en· W2138249341 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFundamenta Informaticae · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIterated functionWord (group theory)MathematicsArithmeticComputer scienceLinguisticsNatural language processingCombinatoricsPhilosophyGeometryMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hairpin completion is an abstract operation modeling a DNA bio-operation which receives as input a DNA strand w = xαy\bar{α}, and outputs w' = xαy\bar{α}\bar{x}, where \bar{x} denotes the Watson-Crick complement of x. In this paper, we focus on the problem of finding conditions under which the iterated hairpin completion of a given word is regular. According to the numbers of words α and \bar{α} that initiate hairpin completion and how they are scattered, we classify the set of all words w. For some basic classes of words w containing small numbers of occurrences of α and \bar{α}, we prove that the iterated hairpin completion of w is regular. For other classes with higher numbers of occurrences of α and \bar{α}, we prove a necessary and sufficient condition for the iterated hairpin completion of a word in these classes to be regular.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.804
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it