MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138251114 · doi:10.1080/10425170600805433

<i>HFM1</i>, the human homologue of yeast Mer3, encodes a putative DNA helicase expressed specifically in germ-line cells

2006· article· en· W2138251114 on OpenAlexaff
Kazunori Tanaka, Natsuki Miyamoto, Junko Shouguchi-Miyata, Joh‐E Ikeda

Bibliographic record

VenueDNA sequence · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyHelicaseRNA Helicase AGeneGeneticsOpen reading frameHuman genomeZinc fingerMolecular biologyGenomePeptide sequenceRNATranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DNA helicases are known to play important roles in the maintenance of genome integrity including the replication of trinucleotide repeats in the cells. Here, we report the HFM1 gene, which encodes the putative human DNA helicase. The HFM1 gene comprises 39 exons mapping to human chromosome 1p22.2. The HFM1 cDNA encompasses 4931 nucleotides with a single open reading frame (ORF) of 1435 amino acid residues encoding a predicted 172 kDa protein (hHFM1). The deduced protein sequence shares similar domain and motif structures to those of Mer3, a DNA helicase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae; seven consecutive motifs conserved among the DEXH-box type of DNA/RNA helicases at the N-terminal and a single putative zinc finger motif at the C-terminal regions of the protein. Further, the HFM1 transcript is preferentially expressed in testis and ovary. Collectively, hHFM1 is the evolutionally conserved putative human DNA helicase, which may function as a modulator for genome integrity in germ-line tissues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.649

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDNA sequenceSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207