MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138260292 · doi:10.2475/ajs.305.6-8.711

Biogenic dissolution of a soil cerium-phosphate mineral

2005· article· en· W2138260292 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Science · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNASA Astrobiology InstituteCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsChemistryDissolutionPhosphateOxalateInorganic chemistrySoil waterApatitePhosphorusEnvironmental chemistryWeatheringBioavailabilityChelationNuclear chemistryMineralogyGeologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The productivity of many terrestrial ecosystems is controlled or limited by phosphorus bioavailability. Within these ecosystems, nearly all of the bioavailable phosphate is ultimately derived via the weathering of apatite [Ca<sub>5</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub> (OH,F,Cl)]. Highly insoluble lanthanide phosphate minerals form during apatite weathering and are important secondary phosphorus repositories in soils. Prior studies indicate that these phases can be dissolved via biologically-mediated pathways. However, mechanistic understanding of biotically- and abiotically-mediated dissolution mechanisms is lacking. We tested the impact of biogenic substances ubiquitous in soils, namely oxalate, ascorbate, citrate, and humic acids, as well as the commercial chelating agent EDTA, on the dissolution of rhabdophane [CePO<sub>4</sub> · H<sub>2</sub>O], a representative of a large class of soil phosphate minerals. We show that these compounds can facilitate the dissolution of rhabdophane at 3 &lt; pH &lt; 8 and result in the non-stoichiometric release of Ce<sup>3+</sup><sub>(aq)</sub> and PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3-</sup><sub>(aq)</sub>. Release of Ce<sup>3+</sup><sub>(aq)</sub> and PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3-</sup><sub>(aq)</sub> is a function of ligand type and pH, except for EDTA, whose impact is not pH dependent. With the exception of oxalate reacted at pH 3, the effectiveness of EDTA surpasses that of any other ligand in releasing Ce<sup>3+</sup><sub>(aq)</sub> from the CePO<sub>4</sub> · H<sub>2</sub>O surface. Speciation calculations are consistent with mineral dissolution through formation of aqueous Ce<sup>3+</sup>-EDTA complexes. Mineral dissolution in the presence of oxalate at low pH likely involves concomitant proton and ligand attack of the mineral surface. In these experiments, a fast release of Ce<sup>3+</sup><sub>(aq)</sub> is followed by a sharp decrease in solution Ce<sup>3+</sup><sub>(aq)</sub> concentration, consistent with precipitation of a Ce phase. In the presence of ligands other than EDTA and oxalate, no accumulation of Ce<sup>3+</sup> occurred in solution due to the precipitation of CeO<sub>2(s)</sub> on the rhabdophane surface. CeO<sub>2</sub> may be responsible for the observed oxidation of ascorbate, as it has been reported for catechol (Cervini-Silva and Banfield, 2003). Our results indicate that rhabdophane dissolution is controlled either by strong ligand complexation of Ce<sup>3+</sup><sub>(aq)</sub> or by sequestration of Ce<sup>4+</sup> ions as CeO<sub>2 (s)</sub>, effectively increasing the mineral solubility. This work shows that interactions between organics, CePO<sub>4</sub> · H<sub>2</sub>O, and CeO<sub>2(s)</sub> imply potentially important linkages among the cerium, phosphorus, and organic carbon cycles in soil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score0.624

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it