MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138265313 · doi:10.1109/icip.2004.1421665

Sar image segmentation with active contours and level sets

2005· article· en· W2138265313 on OpenAlexaff
Ismail Ben Ayed, Carlos Vázquez, Amar Mitiche, Ziad Belhadj

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynthetic aperture radarArtificial intelligenceComputer visionComputer scienceImage segmentationScale-space segmentationSpeckle noiseRegularization (linguistics)Speckle patternSegmentationRadar imagingInverse synthetic aperture radarMultiplicative noiseSegmentation-based object categorizationAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)RadarTransmission (telecommunications)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automatic interpretation of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images requires automatic segmentation of these images. Image segmentation is a fundamental problem in computer vision, particularly difficult with SAR images because of the presence of strong, multiplicative speckle noise. The purpose of this study is to investigate a novel algorithm for segmenting a synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image into a fixed but arbitrary number of Gamma-homogeneous regions. This unsupervised algorithm is based on active contours and consists in evolving closed simple planar curves to minimize a criterion containing a term of conformity of data to a model of SAR image intensity and a term of regularization. The curve evolution equations are implemented via level sets for numerical stability and to allow variations in the topology of the curves during their evolution. Examples are given using real SAR images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.246

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207