MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138296912 · doi:10.1080/00207170802108441

Stabilisation of infinitesimally rigid formations of multi-robot networks

2008· article· en· W2138296912 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Krick, Mireille E. Broucke, Bruce A. Francis

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Control · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfinitesimalRigidity (electromagnetism)Manifold (fluid mechanics)MathematicsGraphNotationDirected graphEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionPolygon (computer graphics)Control theory (sociology)Topology (electrical circuits)Computer scienceControl (management)CombinatoricsMathematical analysisEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article considers the design of a formation control for multivehicle systems that uses only local information. The control is derived from a potential function based on an undirected infinitesimally rigid graph that specifies the target formation. A potential function is obtained from the graph, from which a gradient control is derived. Under this controller the target formation becomes a manifold of equilibria for the multivehicle system. It is shown that infinitesimal rigidity is a sufficient condition for local asymptotical stability of the equilibrium manifold. A complete study of the stability of the regular polygon formation is presented and results for directed graphs are presented as well. Finally, the controller is validated experimentally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations548
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ControlSame topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207