MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138299233 · doi:10.1115/icef2004-0860

A Numerical Study on Uncontrolled Regeneration Processes in Diesel Particulate Filters

2004· article· en· W2138299233 on OpenAlexaff
Dong Wang, Meiping Wang, Graham T. Reader, Ming Zheng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverheating (electricity)SootDiesel particulate filterThermal runawayMaterials scienceParticulatesHeat transferThermalDiesel fuelWaste managementCombustionMechanicsThermodynamicsChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An effective regeneration is needed to remove the accumulated soot in a Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF). However, the sudden heat release by soot oxidation during an uncontrolled thermal regeneration process may cause the substrate of a DPF to overheat. The consequent thermal stress could even result in structural failure. In this paper, a cone-dimensional transient model was employed to describe the exhaust flow, heat transfer, and chemical reaction processes within the DPF substrate during regeneration. The model was validated preliminarily against the experimental data of previous researchers. By using this mode, a variety of uncontrolled regeneration processes were simulated to analyze the different mechanisms of DPF overheating. The results show that the exhaust temperature, oxygen concentration, and PM loading are three major factors that effect DPF overheating. Furthermore, the tendency of uncontrolled thermal runaway could be reduced by changing either the thermal runaway could be reduced by changing either the thermal properties or the structure of the DPF substrate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207