MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138306690 · doi:10.1109/newcas.2005.1496725

The Rapid Prototyping SoC Co-design of a-Proprietary Key Agreement Protocol

2005· article· en· W2138306690 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Ryan Glabb, G.A. Jullien

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptographic Implementations and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyCMC Microsystems
KeywordsKey (lock)Flexibility (engineering)Computer scienceEmbedded systemProtocol (science)Key-agreement protocolArchitectureComputer architectureRapid prototypingComputer networkOperating systemEngineeringPublic-key cryptographyKey distributionEncryption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present an architecture for the rapid prototyping of a novel SoC co-design system based on a proprietary key negotiation protocol for the purpose of secret key agreement over an insecure channel. We exploit the benefits of co-design in this architecture to facilitate both speed and flexibility, and illustrate specific design strategies that reduced our overall design time and showcase the rapid prototyping methodology. The architecture is centred around a key agreement protocol (protected by NE2 Inc., Calgary), and includes several standard crypto IP blocks based on industry standard protocols which are capable of standalone operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptographic Implementations and SecurityFrench-language works237,207