Sobre las condiciones espacio-temporales en la práctica democrática | On the spatio-temporal conditions of democratic practice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este capítulo es parte de un libro contextualizado en la etapa inicial de la post Guerra Fría y los debates sobre la democratización global y el triunfo de la democracia liberal como modelo político. El texto invita a diversas reflexiones sobre la temporalidad y la espacialidad de la democracia en la teoría política, la eficacia de su aplicabilidad, y la falta de cuestionamiento sobre lo que la “democracia” implica más allá de su “encanto cosmopolita”. This chapter is part of a book contextualized in the early Post Cold War era, and within the debates regarding global democratization and the triumph of liberal democracy as political model. The text invites to diverse reflections about the temporality and spatiality of democracy in political theory, the efficiency of its applicability, and the lack of questioning regards what “democracy” implies beyond its “cosmopolitan charm”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".