Minor neurological signs and developmental performance in high risk children at preschool age
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to establish correlations between minor neurological findings and developmental performance. A cohort of 72 preschool children was studied (38 females, 34 males; mean age 3 years 8 months, SD 1 year 2 months, range 2 to 5 years) who were considered to be at high risk due to placental insufficiency. The cohort was divided into four categories of neurological status: (1) minimal cerebral palsy (MCP) with independent walking before age 2 years; (2) Amiel-Tison triad (ATT) including imbalance of passive axial tone, phasic stretch reflex in triceps surae, and cranial signs, particularly on the squamous suture; (3) intermediate with one or two of the three ATT signs; and (4) absence of neurological findings. Six subscales of the Griffiths Mental Developmental Scales assessing locomotion, eye-hand coordination, interpersonal skills, language, performance, and practical reasoning were administered. Significant differences were found according to neurological status in three specific domains of development: coordination (F=2.84, p=0.04), language (F=3.65, p=0.02), and practical reasoning (F=3.62, p=0.02). In addition, significant differences were also found in language (L) and practical reasoning (R) performances according to the side of the abnormal stretch reflex: bilateral stretches (L=87.8; R=75.3) or an isolated right stretch (L=95.3; R=83.6) are more strongly associated with impaired developmental performances than an isolated left stretch (L=101.3; R=88.2) with F=2.94; p=0.04 for language and F=3.00, p=0.04 for practical reasoning. We concluded that a short neurological examination, easily performed by pediatricians and family practitioners, can identify permanent markers of minor brain damage occurring before, during, or soon after birth and so anticipate consequences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".