MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138371625 · doi:10.1109/ias.1994.345450

An on-line operated unity power factor PWM rectifier for AC drive applications

2002· article· en· W2138371625 on OpenAlexaff
Navid R. Zargari, G. Joós

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower factorRectifier (neural networks)PWM rectifierHarmonicsResistorPulse-width modulationCapacitorControl theory (sociology)AC powerTransient (computer programming)HarmonicElectronic engineeringComputer sciencePower (physics)VoltageEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to minimize their impact on the AC supply, AC drives often require an input rectifier stage with low input current harmonics and high input power factor. High efficiency is also desirable. Drawbacks of the conventional off-line operated PWM rectifiers include slow transient response, load dependent input power factor and the need for damping resistors to avoid harmonic amplification and current oscillations, particularly under transient conditions. In this paper, an on-line operated PWM rectifier with inherent damping and pattern synchronization with the AC mains is proposed. Since the modulation scheme uses the voltages across the input filter capacitors as templates, faster transient response is achieved under normal and starting conditions and the need of the damping resistors is eliminated. Moreover, an additional phase-shifting circuit is used in the control scheme to achieve unity power factor, independently of the DC link current variations. The paper includes analysis and design guidelines for the rectifier control circuit. Experimental results on a 1 kVA laboratory prototype confirm the feasibility of the proposed control structure.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207