MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138383645 · doi:10.1109/icassp.1994.389489

Intensity scale invariant motion estimation with rotation and spatial scaling information

2002· article· en· W2138383645 on OpenAlexaff
C. Bussiere, Dimitrios Hatzinakos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMotion estimationOptical flowResamplingImage scalingAffine transformationComputer visionArtificial intelligenceInterpolation (computer graphics)Structure from motionMathematicsMotion interpolationComputer scienceMotion fieldInvariant (physics)Motion (physics)Quarter-pixel motionRotation (mathematics)Transformation (genetics)ScalingBlock-matching algorithmImage (mathematics)Image processingGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a motion estimation (ME) approach which is not constrained by the classical optical flow assumptions of constant illumination intensity and rigid motion with two degrees of freedom. This approach accounts for motion consisting of three dimensions of displacements and three dimensional rotations of a ridged surface. We present a model of this six dimensional motion and show how it can be represented with an affine transformation of an image. Next we present a novel approach of applying the image transformation by satisfying its interpolation and resampling needs in a different manner. The interpolation and resampling process is replaced by a frequency domain shaping technique. Finally we present some simulations of the overall motion estimation technique and compare its performance to the displaced frame difference block matching approach.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207