MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Metabolic dynamics during autumn cold acclimation within and among populations of Sitka spruce (<i>Picea sitchensis</i>)

2012· article· en· W2138389055 on OpenAlexafffund
Rébecca Dauwe, Jason A. Holliday, Sally N. Aitken, Shawn D. Mansfield

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Phytologist · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersGenome Canada
KeywordsAcclimatizationBiologyHardiness (plants)PopulationBotanyLocal adaptationEcologyEcophysiologyPhotosynthesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Autumnal cold acclimation in conifers is a complex process, the timing and extent of which vary widely along latitudinal gradients for many tree species and reflect local adaptation to climate. Although previous studies have detailed some aspects of the metabolic remodelling that accompanies cold acclimation in conifers, little is known about global metabolic dynamics, or how these changes vary among phenotypically divergent populations. • Using untargeted GC-MS metabolite profiling, we monitored metabolic dynamics during autumnal cold acclimation in three populations of Sitka spruce from the southern, central, and northern portions of the species range, which differ in both the timing and extent of cold acclimation. • Latitudinal variation was evident in the nature, intensity, and timing of metabolic events. Early development of strong freezing tolerance in the northern population was associated with a transient accumulation of amino acids. By late autumn, metabolic profiles were highly similar between the northern and central populations, whereas profiles for the southern population were relatively distinct. • Our results provide insight into the metabolic architecture of latitudinal adaptive variation in autumn acclimation and show that different mechanisms are the basis of early October cold hardiness and autumn-acclimated cold hardiness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew PhytologistSame topicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesFrench-language works237,207