MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138389116

Preliminary Study on the Damage Compensation Issues of Administrative Guidance Practice in China

2015· article· en· W2138389116 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tingting Zong

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicOmbudsman and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegalizationCompensation (psychology)ChinaDamagesPosition (finance)Order (exchange)Power (physics)Political scienceBusinessPublic administrationLawFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The practice of administrative guidance can be traced back to the post-world war second era in Japan. It has got great development in 1960s and made a great contribution to the recovery of Japan’s economy. Soon afterwards, the United States, UK and other western countries have also put it into extensive application, which benefited those countries a lot. China has a long history implementation of administrative guidance, but because administrative power takes the dominant position in social management, administrative guidance still do not achieve enough legalization. While administrative guidance has achieved several notable successes in China, the incidental damages it exerted on interest relevant counterparts also cannot be ignored. For the sake of interest relevant counterparts, a thorough study should be leaded in order to study the issues of compensation caused by administrative guidance and build a perfect compensation system of administrative guidance eventually.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.887

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicOmbudsman and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207