Relationship between installation torque and uplift capacity of deep helical piles in sand
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The empirical torque correlation factor (K T ), which relates the uplift capacity to the installation torque of helical piles, is routinely used as an on-site instrument for quality control with this type of foundation. This paper presents a theoretical relationship between uplift capacity and installation torque of deep helical piles in sand. An experimental program, including centrifuge and direct shear interface tests, was carried out to validate this expression. The experimental results were compared with the values predicted by the suggested approach and showed good agreement. As the developed model depends on the residual interface friction angle (δ r ) between the helix surface and the surrounding sand, results of δ r , extracted from different sand samples, are presented for use in this suggested relationship on site. Also, the values of K T found in this work were compared with those of field and laboratory tests on helical piles in sand reported in the literature. From this analysis, it was found that the measured values of K T decrease with an increase in pile dimensions and, in most of cases, with an increase in sand friction angle. These results were explained by the presented model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it