MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138469347 · doi:10.1149/1.3035364

In-situ Surface Recombination Measurement of Oxygen and Chlorine Atoms on Dynamic Stainless Steel Surfaces in Inductively Coupled O2 and Cl2 Plasmas

2008· article· en· W2138469347 on OpenAlexafffund
Luc Stafford, Rohit Khare, Joydeep Guha, Vincent M. Donnelly

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAuger electron spectroscopyMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)DesorptionSticking probabilityRecombinationOxygenOxideAnodizingLayer (electronics)ChlorineAtom (system on chip)Atomic physicsAluminiumChemistryMetallurgyAdsorptionComposite materialPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigated the desorption dynamics of O2 and Cl2 molecules from electropolished stainless steel surfaces following Langmuir-Hinshelwood (i.e., delayed) heterogeneous recombination of oxygen and chlorine atoms, using the spinning-substrate technique. Near real-time elemental analysis by in-situ Auger electron spectroscopy showed that the stainless steel surface became rapidly coated with a Si-oxide-based layer (Fe:[Si+Al]:O = 1:2:9 for O2 and Fe:Si:O:Cl = 1:7:15:6 for Cl2), due to the slow erosion of the fused silica discharge tube and anodized Al chamber walls. For O atoms, the recombination probability was 0.09 {plus minus} 0.01 and was independent of the O flux impinging onto the surface. The recombination probability of Cl atoms ranged from 0.004 to 0.03 and increased with Cl-to-Cl2 number density ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.305
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207