MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138469966 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.081536

Balancing evidence and opinion in stroke care: the 2008 best practice recommendations

2008· editorial· en· W2138469966 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mark Bayley, Patrice Lindsay, Chelsea Hellings, E. Woodbury, Michael D. Hill

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2008
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsOntario Stroke NetworkQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStroke (engine)Healthcare deliveryHealth careBest practiceMEDLINEBest evidenceMeta-analysisMedicineHealth care deliveryComputer scienceData scienceMedical emergencyFamily medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research in stroke care is generating new information at a rate that challenges our ability to effect health-system change in a timely manner. For example, 10 years after publication of a meta-analysis showing that delivery of care in a specialized stroke unit reduced the likelihood of death and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.051
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.165
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0510.165
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.005
Bibliometrics0.0080.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0120.009
Open science0.0080.003
Research integrity0.0260.040
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207