Angiotensin II and its receptors in human endocardial endothelial cells: role in modulating intracellular calcium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aims of the present study are to investigate the presence and distribution of angiotensin II (Ang II), as well as AT1 and AT2 receptors, in endocardial endothelial cells (EECs) and to determine if the effect of Ang II on intracellular calcium in these cells is mediated via the AT1 or the AT2 receptor. Immunofluorescence and 3D confocal microscopy techniques were used on 20-week-old fetal human EECs. Our results showed that Ang II and its receptors, the AT1 and the AT2 types, are present and exhibit a different distribution in human EECs. Ang II labelling is found throughout the cell with a fluorescence signal higher in the cytosol when compared with the nucleus. Like Ang II, the AT1 receptor fluorescence signal is also homogeneously distributed in human EECs but with a preferential labelling at the level of the nucleus, while the AT2 receptor labelling is solely present in the nucleus. Using fluo-3 and 3D confocal microscopy technique, superfusion of human EECs with increasing concentration of Ang II induced a dose-dependent sustained increase in free cytosolic and nuclear Ca2+ levels. This effect of Ang II on human EEC's intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]) was completely prevented by losartan, an AT1 receptor antagonist. Our results suggest that Ang II, as well as AT1 and AT2 receptors, is present but differentially distributed in EECs of 20-week-old fetal human hearts, and that the AT1 receptor mediates the effects of Ang II on [Ca2+]i in these cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".