MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138518103 · doi:10.1648/0273-8570-75.2.113

A comparative analysis of laying times in passerine birds

2004· article· en· W2138518103 on OpenAlexaffabout
D. Glen McMaster, Diane L. H. Neudorf, Spencer G. Sealy, Trevor E. Pitcher

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Field Ornithology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPasserineBiologyCowbirdLayingBrood parasiteForagingNest (protein structural motif)PredationEcologyZoologyParasitismHost (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We documented the time of day of laying and the total time spent on the nest during laying (laying bout) in 21 species of passerine birds and the brood-parasitic Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater) at Delta Marsh, Manitoba, between 1989 and 1995. Brown-headed Cowbirds laid on average 31.2 min before sunrise, whereas mean laying times of the other species ranged from 11.3 min after sunrise through early afternoon. Species that laid later in the day tended to spend more time on their nests during laying. Smaller species tended to lay earlier in the day and had significantly shorter laying bouts than larger species. Future studies accounting for variation in foraging and reproductive behavior and predation risk between taxonomic groups may explain additional variation in laying time and duration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Field OrnithologySame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207