MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138518227 · doi:10.1109/ipdps.2008.4536502

Web-based e-learning in 3D large scale distributed interactive simulations using HLA/RTI

2008· article· en· W2138518227 on OpenAlexaff
Lotfi Ahmad, Azzedine Boukerche, Amir Hamidi, Ahmad Shadid, Richard W. Pazzi

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings - IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVRMLComputer scienceX3DWeb applicationHigh-level architectureVirtual realityOverhead (engineering)ArchitectureDistributed Interactive SimulationClass (philosophy)Human–computer interactionComputer architectureDistributed computingArtificial intelligenceOperating systemInteroperability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we investigate the integration of HLA/RTI with VRML/X3D in order to provide a training facility that can be accessed through a traditional web browser. We apply our proposed architecture on a test bed that consists of a cancer treatment scenario within a 3D virtual Radiology Department. We have incorporated the High Level Architecture HLA standard as an important corner stone in allowing the e-learning environment to be distributed and interactive. Combining Virtual Reality concepts with the real pivots of HLA/RTI can create a very strong foundation for such a valuable and required class of applications by utilizing all reliable technologies to make it as flexible as possible. We have ensured that any foreseen future optimizations could be incorporated easily without any overhead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings - IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing SymposiumSame topicSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207