MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138603716 · doi:10.1109/cca.2005.1507315

An efficient photovoltaic DC village electricity scheme using a sliding mode controller

2005· article· en· W2138603716 on OpenAlexaff
Adel M. Sharaf, Liang Yang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemController (irrigation)Renewable energyComputer scienceDC motorMaximum power principleControl theory (sociology)Automotive engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a novel dynamic maximum photovoltaic (PV) power tracking controller using an error driven, error scaled self-adjusting sliding mode controller for maximum PV energy utilization in a low cost stand-alone photovoltaic resort/village electric energy supply scheme. The novel dynamic controller utilizes motor speed trajectory tracking loop with additional dynamic photovoltaic power tracking loop. This ensures both good dynamic speed tracking and near maximum photovoltaic energy utilization at all times, especially under varying ambient temperature (Tx) and solar irradiation (Sx) conditions. The proposed novel dynamic controller requires only the PV array output voltage and current signals and the DC motor speed signals that can be easily measured. Satisfactory results are obtained with the proposed dynamic dual loop controller for the PV array feeding resistive loads (lighting and heating) as well as PMDC motor. The proposed stand-alone (photovoltaic renewable energy supply scheme is suitable for low cost resort/village electricity applications in the range of (150 watts to 15000 watts), mostly for water pumping, water heating, lighting and village irrigation use in arid developing countries

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207