MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138613764 · doi:10.1115/1.4007502

Constrained Adjoint-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Single-Stage Transonic Compressor

2012· article· en· W2138613764 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Turbomachinery · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTurbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransonicAirfoilAerodynamicsShape optimizationTurbomachineryRotor (electric)Adjoint equationStatorGas compressorMathematicsAxial compressorControl theory (sociology)Mathematical optimizationComputer scienceMechanicsAerospace engineeringMathematical analysisPhysicsEngineeringMechanical engineeringFinite element methodPartial differential equationStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper develops a discrete adjoint formulation for the constrained aerodynamic shape optimization in a multistage turbomachinery environment. The adjoint approach for viscous internal flow problems and the corresponding adjoint boundary conditions are discussed. To allow for a concurrent rotor/stator optimization, a nonreflective adjoint mixing-plane formulation is proposed. A sequential-quadratic programming algorithm is utilized to determine an improved airfoil shape based on the objective function gradient provided by the adjoint solution. The functionality of the proposed optimization method is demonstrated by the redesign of a midspan section of a single-stage transonic compressor. The objective is to maximize the isentropic efficiency while constraining the mass flow rate and the total pressure ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.849

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it