Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma in Children: A Review of Medical and Surgical Management at a Tertiary Care Center
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review our institutional experience managing pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas in children. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of the Mayo Clinic database from 1975 to 2005 identified 30 patients < 18 years of age with histologically confirmed pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. RESULTS: There were 12 patients with pheochromocytomas and 18 with paragangliomas. The most common presenting symptoms were hypertension (64%), palpitation (53%), headache (47%), and mass-related effects (30%). Nine patients (30%) had a genetic mutation or documented family history of pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. Fourteen patients (47%) had malignant disease, whereas 16 (53%) had benign disease. Logistic analysis showed that statistically significant risk factors for malignancy were (1) paraganglioma, (2) apparently sporadic, as opposed to familial, pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma, and (3) tumor size of > 6 cm. Surgical resection was performed for 28 patients (93%), with perioperative mortality and major morbidity rates of 0% and 10%, respectively. Resection achieved symptomatic relief for 25 patients (83%). All patients with benign disease appeared cured after resection. For patients with malignant disease, the 5- and 10-year disease-specific survival rates were 78% and 31%, respectively, and the mean survival time was 157 +/- 32 months. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of malignant pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma was high in children (47%), particularly those with apparently sporadic disease, paraganglioma, and tumor diameters of > 6 cm. Patients with a known genetic mutation or familial pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma were more likely to achieve resection with negative microscopic margins and had improved disease-specific mortality rates. Surgical resection remains the treatment of choice for pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".