MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138650374 · doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.98.8.1607

Endeavour Copper-Gold Porphyry Deposits, Northparkes, New South Wales: Intrusive History and Fluid Evolution

2003· article· en· W2138650374 on OpenAlexaff
V. Lickfold, David R. Cooke, Steven M. Smith, T. Ullrich

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Geology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersUniversity of Tasmania
KeywordsQuartz monzoniteGeologyGeochemistryStockworkSericiteDikePorphyry copper depositPorphyriticIron oxide copper gold ore depositsChalcopyritePlutonQuartzFluid inclusionsPaleontologyCopper

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Four economic porphyry copper-gold deposits, Endeavour 22, 26, 27, and 48, occur within the Late Ordovician \nGoonumbla Volcanic Complex of central-west New South Wales, Australia. Together these deposits \nhave a combined ore reserve of 63.6 million metric tons (Mt) at 1.1 percent copper and 0.5 g/t gold. Mineralization \nis centered in narrow, pipelike quartz monzonite porphyry (QMP) intrusive complexes. \nWe have recognized at least nine intrusive phases within the Endeavour deposits. These are, in order of emplacement, \nas follows: a premineral equigranular monzodiorite; early-mineral, equigranular to weakly porphyritic \nbiotite quartz monzonite (BQM) stocks and dikes; synmineral K-feldspar QMP (K-QMP) pipes and \ndikes; late-mineral augite-biotite–K-feldspar QMP (KA-QMP) intrusions and biotite QMP (B-QMP) dikes; and \npostmineral basaltic trachyandesite dikes, augite monzonite porphyry dikes, and basaltic dikes. \nEarly-stage biotite-magnetite and propylitic alteration of the host volcanic rocks and K-feldspar alteration of \nthe BQM occurred at each deposit during the intrusion of the BQM stocks and early-mineral B-QMP dikes. \nTransitional-stage unidirectional solidification textures and other related anisotropic textures formed mostly \nduring the emplacement of K-QMP and KA-QMP intrusions. Main-stage sulfide mineralization at all four deposits \nis spatially and temporally associated with the K-QMP and, to a lesser extent, KA-QMP intrusions and \ntheir associated K-feldspar and sericite-hematite alteration assemblages, and is characterized by multiple generations \nof stockwork and sheeted quartz, K-feldspar, bornite, chalcopyrite, and gold-bearing veins. Late-stage \nsericite-quartz-copper-sulfide-carbonate-hematite alteration and vein assemblages formed prior to the emplacement \nof the postmineral intrusions. Weak to moderate postmineral propylitic alteration assemblages were \nthe last alteration event related to the QMP intrusive complexes. Intrusive activity and associated biotite alteration \noccurred between 446 and 437 Ma, based on 40Ar/39Ar analyses of biotite and hornblende. \nBased on microthermometric analyses of fluid inclusions from early-, transitional-, main-, and late-stage \nveins, the Endeavour deposits formed at depths between 1,000 and 1,700 m below the paleosurface, with a \nlithostatic pressure regime prevailing throughout the early, transitional, and main stages and near-hydrostatic \npressures during the late-stage sericitic events. The first three stages were dominated by high-temperature \n(460°–>550°C) magmatic-hydrothermal brines with salinities of ~55 to 60 wt percent NaCl ± KCl equiv. Although \nthe late-stage fluids were cooler (350°–400°C) and less saline (~40 wt % NaCl equiv), their compositions \nare consistent with the magmatic-hydrothermal origin indicated by previous oxygen and hydrogen isotope \nstudies, confirming that the Endeavour porphyry deposits are representatives of the orthomagmatic end member \nof the porphyry continuum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.155
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations90
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomic GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207