MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138653475 · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2000.886519

On Lyapunov's stability control of two-link base-excited inverted pendulums with applications to human locomotion

2002· article· en· W2138653475 on OpenAlexaff
Q. Wu, R. Swain

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Locomotion and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Lyapunov functionController (irrigation)Computer sciencePosition (finance)Stability (learning theory)PiecewiseGaitLyapunov stabilityBase (topology)TorqueInverted pendulumPhysicsControl (management)MathematicsNonlinear systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Control of a chain of two planar inverted pendulums is studied in this paper. The goal is to keep the pendulums at the upright position in spite of the free base point motion. First a piecewise continuous controller is developed which guarantees the global stability of the system in the sense of Lyapunov. This idealized controller, however, is not desirable from the implementation viewpoint. A continuous control law is then proposed. It is found that the continuous controller only guarantees the stability in a suitable sense. The effectiveness of the developed controllers is tested through computer simulations. The above inverted pendulums are then used to simulate human thorax and pelvic movement during walking. The simulation results are compared with those from gait measurements and found that the above pendulums are capable of producing displacements and torques for the human thorax and the pelvis during normal walking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Locomotion and ControlFrench-language works237,207