MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138689264 · doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00190.2003

Glucose transporter in bovine mammary epithelial cells is an asymmetric carrier that exhibits cooperativity and <i>trans-</i>stimulation

2003· article· en· W2138689264 on OpenAlexaff
Changting Xiao, J.P. Cant

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDigestive system and related health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCooperativityStimulationTransporterSolute carrier familyChemistryInternal medicineGlucose transporterEndocrinologyCell biologyBiophysicsBiologyMedicineBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glucose transport kinetics were quantified in isolated bovine mammary epithelial cells using 3-O-methyl-D-glucose. Isolated cells retained satisfactory viability and glucose uptake activity, which was inhibited by cytochalasin B, phloretin, HgCl2, and low temperature. Initial rates of entry were measured over a 15-s interval at 37 degrees C under zero-trans, equilibrium-exchange, high-cis, and high-trans concentrations of 3-O-methyl-D-glucose between 0 and 20 mM. The combined set of rate measurements from all experimental conditions was fit to the fixed-site carrier model by nonlinear regression to estimate parameters of transport. For the regression between predicted and observed initial rates, r2 was 0.97. Forward Vmax was estimated at 18.2 nmol.min-1.mg protein-1, and the Michaelis constant was 8.29 mM. The cooperativity parameter was 1.63, trans-stimulation was 2.13-fold, and asymmetry was 2.06-fold. On the basis of the kinetic parameters, variations in intracellular glucose concentrations are not responsible for the range of glucose uptakes by bovine mammary glands observed in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Cell PhysiologySame topicDigestive system and related healthFrench-language works237,207