MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138699983 · doi:10.1109/lcn.2008.4664156

Delay constrained placement of mobile data collectors in underwater acoustic sensor networks

2008· article· en· W2138699983 on OpenAlexafffund
Waleed Alsalih, Hossam Hassanein, Selim G. Akl

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsUnderwaterComputer scienceRelayRouting (electronic design automation)Propagation delayReal-time computingAcoustic sensorSolverWireless sensor networkUnderwater acoustic communicationInteger programmingUpper and lower boundsComputer networkAlgorithmMathematicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a scheme for routing and placement of mobile data collectors in Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks (UASNs). The proposed scheme maximizes the lifetime of the network with an upper bound on the maximum delay. We assume a 3D architecture, in which on-the-surface data collectors gather data from underwater sensors and relay them to an on-shore sink. We divide the lifetime of the network into fixed length rounds and move the data collectors to new locations at the beginning of each round. This problem is formulated as an Integer Linear Program (ILP), and we use an ILP solver to find the optimal placement of data collectors together with the multi-hop routing paths to deliver data from underwater sensors to data collectors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt towards the placement of data collectors in a 3D environment with delay constraints. When compared with other schemes, our scheme has shown the capability to achieve longer lifetime and shorter delay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207