MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138735546 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2009.5090086

Face verification with changeable templates

2009· article· en· W2138735546 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTemplateOrthonormal basisFace (sociological concept)Set (abstract data type)Similarity (geometry)Feature (linguistics)BiometricsFeature extractionPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceTranslation (biology)Data miningImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new method for addressing the challenging problem of generating changeable and privacy preserving templates for face based biometric verification systems. The proposed method transforms the extracted face feature vector by a random orthonormal matrix, and the sorted index numbers of the resulting feature vector in the transformed domain is stored as template for verification. A new matching algorithm is introduced for measuring the similarity between the template and the authenticating image. Two different application scenarios, user-independent and user-dependent transformations are discussed. A vector translation technique is introduced to enhance the changeability of the generated templates. Experimental results on a large face data set demonstrate that the proposed method may improve the verification performance, produce strong changeability, and protect the user's privacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiometric Identification and SecurityFrench-language works237,207