Interpréter la créativité du raisonnement dans les productions d’élèves en mathématiques d’une communauté d’apprentissages multidisciplinaires interactifs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En approfondissant le concept du jeu symbolique (Vygotsky, 1933/1966) traité dans la théorie de l’imagination créative (Smolucha, 1992), nous avons défini la notion d’imagination et de créativité pour la situer dans le processus d’apprentissage des élèves (DeBlois, 2003). Ces productions s’inscrivent dans le contexte de la résolution de problèmes algébriques par des élèves du troisième cycle du primaire et du premier cycle du secondaire. Notre étude a porté sur 50 productions d’élèves venant d’une communauté d’apprentissages multidisciplinaires interactifs (CAMI). Nous avons utilisé la métaphore des couleurs pour cerner les quatre créativités émergeant des productions des élèves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".