MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138758246 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2011.6134370

A Novel Routing Algorithm in Cognitive Radio Ad Hoc Networks

2011· article· en· W2138758246 on OpenAlexafffund
Jun Li, Yifeng Zhou, Louise Lamont, François Gagnon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureCommunications Research Centre Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceLink-state routing protocolComputer networkDynamic Source RoutingDestination-Sequenced Distance Vector routingStatic routingWireless Routing ProtocolMultipath routingDistributed computingPolicy-based routingOptimized Link State Routing ProtocolWireless ad hoc networkAdaptive quality of service multi-hop routingRouting protocolRouting (electronic design automation)TelecommunicationsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cognitive radio ad hoc networks (CRAHNs) have become a popular network architecture for connecting mobile nodes thanks to the flexibility and adaptability of such type of network. In this paper, we propose a novel scheme for efficient routing design in CRAHNs. The proposed routing scheme firstly forms a simple directed graph for the given physical network. Using the simple directed graph, multiple optimal routing paths can be computed for a pair of cognitive radio users. An optimal routing path minimizes both the hop count and the adjacent hop interference. Examples are used to demonstrate the performance and efficiency of the proposed CRAHN routing technique. Results are also compared with other existing routing techniques for CRAHNs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.774

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207