MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Demographic Assessment of a Marbled Murrelet Population from Capture‐Recapture Data

2003· article· en· W2138811774 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Emmanuelle Cam, Lynn W. Lougheed, Russell Bradley, Fred Cooke

Bibliographic record

VenueConservation Biology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSimon Fraser University
KeywordsMark and recaptureSeabirdPopulationGeographyRange (aeronautics)Population sizePopulation growthDemographyVital ratesPopulation declineEcologyPopulation modelFisheryBiologyPredation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Population size is a fundamental variable of interest in most conservation programs, as are the demographic processes underlying variation in numbers. The Marbled Murrelet ( Brachyramphus marmoratus ) is a seabird nesting in coastal old‐growth forest in North America and is at the heart of a controversy concerning forest management. Despite the urgent need for a careful assessment of the demographic state of populations, the species is so secretive that its life history is poorly known and reliable estimates of the required vital rates are rare or missing. Here we present the first survival estimates obtained through capture‐recapture data from a population in British Columbia, Canada. This population is in a site that has been heavily logged in the last 50 years and continues to be logged. Survival estimates ( 0.8289 and 0.9289 based on different samples corresponding to two capture techniques ) fell within the range specified for small alcids, indicating that neither mortality nor emigration out of the study area is particularly high in the population. We used capture‐recapture data to estimate the realized population growth rate ( λ ) from 1991 to 2000. λ^ was < 1 ( 0.9851 ), but the confidence interval was large and included 1 ( stationary population ). This estimate was obtained using part of the data ( the sample with the higher survival rate ) to meet the assumptions of the analytical approach. This lambda value might not reflect the growth rate of the overall population but may be specific to the segment of the population that successfully bred. The hypothetical value of λ corresponding to a survival probability of 0.8289 was 0.8593, which suggests that the population may be declining if the local survival rate based on the combined samples is closer to the true value. Because of our low recapture rates and poor precision of estimates, there is still uncertainty regarding the health of this population. Development of field techniques and achievement of higher detection probability should reduce uncertainty in future demographic studies of Marbled Murrelets and allow refined assessment of the conservation status of populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConservation BiologySame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207