MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Systemic plant signal triggers genome instability

2004· article· en· W2138863316 on OpenAlexafffund
Jody Filkowski, Allan Yeoman, Olga Kovalchuk, Igor Kovalchuk

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Plant Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSalicylic acidGenome instabilitySystemic administrationHomologous recombinationTransgeneRadicalRecombinationChemistryRose bengalEndogenyDNABiologyDNA damageBiochemistryGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previously, we have shown that infection of tobacco plants with a viral pathogen triggers local and systemic induction of homologous recombination (HR). Here, we have tested the hypothesis of whether free radicals are potentially involved in the induction of the systemic effect. We report a significant induction of HR in tobacco plants treated with radical-generating agents, UVC or rose Bengal (RB). Importantly, the recombination increase was observed in local (treated) as well as systemic (non-treated) tissue. The systemic increase in recombination implies the existence of a signal that is transmitted to non-treated tissue. Several sets of grafting experiments proved the generation of said signal by both RB and UVC exposure. A statistically significant increase in HR was observed in tissue that received a systemic signal via a grafted leaf. Similar data were obtained from transgenic plants naphthalene degrading salicylate 1-hydroxylase (NahG) unable to accumulate salicylic acid (SA). Interestingly, pre-treatment of plants with the radical-scavenging compound N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC) led to a significantly lower recombination increase upon grafting after treatment with UVC and RB. Moreover, leaves taken for grafting from NAC-pre-treated plants exhibited a lower level of oxidized organic compounds. Our data suggest the involvement of free radical production in either generation or maintenance of the recombination signal. We discuss potential mechanisms for generation of the signal and possible adaptive advantages of enhanced genomic flexibility following exposure to DNA-damaging agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Plant JournalSame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207