A Joint Fusion, Power Allocation and Delay Optimization Approach for Wireless Sensor Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the cross-layer optimization of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) under the constraints of total energy consumption and transmission delay. A Gaussian WSN with time division multiple access (TDMA) media access control (MAC) layer protocol is used here. The sensed data are contaminated by sensor noise, before converting to digital bits by quantization. The digital bits are transmitted through a noisy wireless communication channel. In fusing the sensed information from individual sensors, a fusion rule is employed to recover the original data. Least square error (LSE) rule is considered here due to its low computation complexity. The mean distortion level is employed to measure the system performance. Since the battery life is limited and the data delay is crucial, we propose here to optimize the transmission power allocation strategy and the delay of each node in order to minimize the mean distortion of the measured information. Using computer simulations, the proposed adaptive approach is shown to provide an effective sensing in terms of performance and energy consumption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it