The Svalbardian-Ellesmerian deformation of the Old Red Sandstone and the pre-Devonian basement in NW Spitsbergen (Svalbard)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In NW Spitsbergen, the Late Silurian to Late Devonian infill of an Old Red Sandstone (ORS) basin was affected by west-vergent folding and west-directed thrusting during the Early Carboniferous (Tournaisian) Svalbardian deformation. The brittle, predominantly compressional structures of the Svalbardian Fold-and-Thrust Belt are concentrated along at least five narrow, more or less north-south-trending zones. Three zones are exposed in the Devonian infill of the ORS basin. The involvement of the post-Caledonian ?Late Silurian to Earliest Devonian Viggobreen weathering zone and deposits Early Devonian in two thrust zones within the basement of the western basin margin indicates that the Svalbardian deformation also affected the basement areas along the west coast of NW Spitsbergen. Structures of the Svalbardian Fold-and-Thrust Belt are exposed within an area at least 100 km wide between the Billefjorden Fault Zone in the east and the west coast of NW Spitsbergen. Therefore, the Svalbardian deformation represents a much more important fold belt than previously recognized. On the basis of the timing, the large extent and the orientation of the fold-and-thrust zones, the Svalbardian Fold-and-Thrust Belt appears to represent the eastern continuation of the Ellesmerian Fold Belt in North Greenland and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".