MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138953846 · doi:10.1183/09031936.02.00307502

Pulmonary medicine and (adult) critical care medicine in Europe: Fig. 1.—

2002· review· en· W2138953846 on OpenAlexfundno aff
T. W Evans, Malcolm Elliott, Marco Ranieri, Werner Seeger, Thomas Similowski, Ana Sánchez Torres, C. Roussos

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Respiratory Journal · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Society of Intensive Care MedicineNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensMcGill University
KeywordsPoliomyelitisEuropean unionMedicineIntensive careFamily medicinePolitical sciencePediatricsIntensive care medicineBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been growing concern within the European Respiratory Society (ERS) that pulmonary physicians are becoming less involved in the practise of intensive care medicine (ICM). A Working Party (WP) was therefore established to identify issues that might explain this trend. No precise terms of reference were issued to guide this exercise. The WP ensured that its report focussed on improving patient care. With this proviso, the WP aimed to: 1) briefly identify the current working practices of pulmonary physicians practicing ICM in six European Union (EU) countries (France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Spain and UK); 2) discuss possible opportunities to expand the influence of pulmonary physicians in the provision of acute care; and 3) determine the implications of 1) for training programmes. The following methods were employed. 1) Relevant literature was extracted and a draft report concerning the three points discussed previously was prepared and circulated to the members of the WP. 2) A 1-day meeting was held in Paris on March 26th, 2001, and the contents of the draft report discussed and refined. 3) A second draft was prepared and circulated. 4) A final report was forwarded to the executives of the ERS. In Europe, ICM is one of the most recent clinical disciplines to evolve. The polio epidemic in Denmark in 1952 showed that careful airway management with the application of positive pressure ventilation could dramatically reduce mortality in patients who presented with paralysis of the respiratory muscles. This focus on airway care and ventilatory management encouraged anaesthesiologists to lead the way in the introduction of critical care facilities. Technological advances in the 1960s led to the development of sophisticated physiological monitoring equipment. The subsequent recognition that the diagnosis and management of critical illness required additional skills to those incorporated into training in anaesthesiology, attracted clinicians trained in …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Respiratory JournalSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207