MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139007797 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2003.1226344

Performance evaluation platform for xDSL deployment in a complex multi-segment environment

2004· article· en· W2139007797 on OpenAlexaff
N. Caouras, M. M. Freda, F. Monfet, V.S. Aldea, O. Naeem, Tho Le‐Ngoc, Benoı̂t Champagne

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital subscriber lineSoftware deploymentComputer scienceGraphical user interfaceSoftwareVariety (cybernetics)ImplementationUser interfaceInterface (matter)Embedded systemComputer architectureSoftware engineeringSystems engineeringOperating systemEngineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a highly flexible simulation platform catering to the easy and rapid evaluation of existing and future digital subscriber line (DSL) deployments as well as DSL modem performance prediction using practical modem implementations in a complex multi-segment environment. The paper outlines the methodology employed to architect and develop the core software, followed by a description of the performance prediction hooks for a variety of current and future DSL modem technologies. The graphical user interface (GUI) abstracting the core software for the user is described in terms of the various configuration options and the quick and easy graphical design of typical and complex deployment scenarios. The proposed simulator's calculations, notably theoretical SNR margin, maximum theoretical capacity and reach, plus performance evaluation using user-designed modem models, are also outlined. To support the accuracy of the new simulator, results for some example scenarios are presented and compared against other available simulators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207