MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139052438 · doi:10.1063/1.3039823

γ-ray Spectroscopy of Proton Drip-Line Nuclei in the A∼130 Region using SPIRAL beams

2008· article· en· W2139052438 on OpenAlexaff
O. Stézowski, D. Guinet, P. Lautesse, M. Meyer, N. Redon, B. Rossé, Ch. Schmitt, P. J. Nolan, A. J. Boston, R.J. Cooper, Matthew Dimmock, S. Gros, B. McGuirck, E. S. Paul, M. Petri, H. C. Scraggs, G. Turk, G. de France, S. Bhattachasyya, G. Mukherjee, F. Rejmund, M. Rejmund, H. Savajols, J. N. Scheurer, B. M. Nyakó, J. Gál, J. Molnár, J. Tímár, L. Zolnai, A. Astier, I. Deloncle, M.-G. Porquet, A. Prévost, K. Juhász, R. Wadsworth, P. Joshi, G. La Rana, R. Moro, M. Trotta, E. Vardaci, G. Hackman, G. C. Ball, I. Boztosun, A. B. Balantekin

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeam (structure)PhysicsProtonSpectrometerLine (geometry)Atomic physicsSpiral (railway)SpectroscopyEvaporationNuclear physicsDetectorOpticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fusion‐evaporation experiment has been performed with a SPIRAL 76Kr radioactive beam in order to study the deformation of rare‐earth nuclei near the proton drip‐line. The experimental setup consisted in the EXOGAM γ‐array, coupled to the light‐charged particles (LCP) DIAMANT detector and to the VAMOS heavy‐ion spectrometer. The difficulties inherent to such measurements are enlightened. The coupling between EXOGAM and DIAMANT has been used to decrease the huge background caused by the radioactivity of the beam. It further permits assigning new γ‐ray transitions to specific residual nuclei. A γ‐ray belonging to the 130Pm level scheme has thus been observed for the first time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207