Real-Time Estimation of Missing Markers for Reconstruction of Human Motion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Optical motion capture is a prevalent technique for capturing and analyzing movement. However, a common problem in optical motion capture is the missing marker problem due to occlusions or ambiguities. Most methods for resolving this problem either require extensive post-processing efforts or become ineffective when a significant portion of markers are missing for extended periods of time. In this paper, we present an approach to reconstruct human motion corrupted in the presence of missing or mis-tracking markers. We propose a data-driven, piecewise linear predicting kalman filter framework to estimate missing marker position, and reconstruct human motion in real time by rigid body tracking solver. It allows us to accurately and effectively reconstruct human motion within a simple extrapolation framework. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on real motion data captured using OptiTrack. Our experimental results demonstrate that our method is efficient in recovering human motion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it