Stroke: More than a ‘Brain Attack’
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stroke is a life-altering event that potentially affects stroke survivors, their families, healthcare resources, and society in general. Stroke has often been described as 'brain attack', denoting emergency emphasis on the vascular pathology. Consequently, many national and provincial stroke strategies have emphasized vascular care through primary prevention strategies and thrombolysis. Despite being important initiatives, this has resulted in a stroke system that emphasizes the frontloading of stroke care, focusing on the vascular pathology. The advent of thrombolysis therapy has benefited a small proportion of patients while a vast majority are still affected by stroke-related impairments. Management of the vascular elements of stroke is important; however, the impact of rehabilitation on stroke recovery has been relatively undervalued. Stroke care is in need of a revolution toward a more comprehensive and balanced approach. It is anticipated that the major focus of stroke care will include promoting recovery, in line with the growing evidence on stroke rehabilitation interventions. A paradigm shift is necessary to ensure that comprehensive and balanced stroke care which incorporates rehabilitation is taken into account, leading to a stroke care system where patient needs are managed both as a 'brain attack' and an 'injured brain'.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".