MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B15: Genomic and epigenomic events in arsenic-related lung squamous cell carcinomas from smokers and never smokers

2012· article· en· W2139161666 on OpenAlexaffabout
Daiana D. Becker‐Santos, Emily A. Vucic, Stephen Lam, Wan L. Lam, Victor D. Martínez

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicArsenic contamination and mitigation
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLung cancerCarcinogenesisArsenicEpigenomicsDNA methylationPopulationCancer researchEpigeneticsBiologyMethylationOncologyMedicineCancerPhysiologyGeneticsEnvironmental healthChemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Arsenic is a well-known human carcinogen. An estimated of 160 million people (∼2% of total human population) are exposed to levels above the recommended threshold (10 μg/L) in Bangladesh, Taiwan, Mongolia, India, China, Argentina, Mexico, Canada, USA, and Chile, among others countries. Skin, bladder, liver, kidney and lungs are the main targets of arsenic carcinogenicity. Lung cancer (LC) is the most deadly form of neoplasia associated to arsenic ingestion. Additionally, lung squamous cell carcinomas (SqCC) occur at higher rates than other LC subtypes following exposure to this metalloid. Both genetic and epigenetic changes (some of them related to arsenic biotransformation) have been proposed to drive carcinogenesis; however, mechanisms are not fully understood. Here, we have compiled a panel of lung tumors from a population with chronic arsenic exposure, including a rare set of lung SqCC from patients who have never smoked. We analyzed to identify whole genome arsenic associated copy-number alterations (CNAs), copy-number variations (CNVs) and global DNA methylation changes. Methods: 52 lung SqCC were analyzed by whole-genome tiling path comparative genomic hybridization for CNA. Twenty-two were from arsenic exposed patients from Chile (10 never smokers and 12 smokers), and 30 additional non-exposed cases were from North America. In addition, 22 blood samples from healthy individuals from Northern Chile were examined to identify naturally occurring germline CNVs. Global DNA methylation analyses for 5 arsenic-exposed cases from never smokers were performed using Illumina's Infinium Human Methylation 450K array. Results: We identified arsenic related CNAs occurring in lung SqCC from patients with chronic exposure to this. The most recurrent events were represented by DNA losses at chromosomes 1q21.1, 7p22.3, 9q12, and 19q13.31. Also, we observed a single arsenic-associated DNA gain at 19q13.33, which contains genes related to single strand DNA breaks repair and neoplastic processes. Interestingly, alterations in this region have been reported to be more frequent among lung adenocarcinomas from never smokers compared with smokers. Additionally, distinctive DNA methylation patterns were associated to arsenic related lung SqCC from never smokers, indicating these changes can have an impact on carcinogenic mechanisms for this subgroup of lung tumors Conclusions: Our study provides insights into the molecular mechanisms of arsenic-induced lung SqCC. Moreover, findings specifically associated to cases among never smokers contribute to understand malignant events occurring in this rare subgroup of lung tumors. The unique and recurrent set of arsenic-associated genetic and epigenetic alterations suggests that this group of tumors may be considered as a distinct disease subclass. Finally, elucidation of the mechanisms underlying the initiation and promotion of carcinogenesis related to arsenic biotransformation processes is of foremost importance to the development of early detection protocols and treatment options for affected individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicArsenic contamination and mitigationFrench-language works237,207