MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139237627 · doi:10.1159/000349933

Common Hemodynamic Problems in the Neonate

2013· review· en· W2139237627 on OpenAlexaff
Keith J. Barrington

Bibliographic record

VenueNeonatology · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemodynamicsMedicineContext (archaeology)Cardiogenic shockIntensive care medicineShock (circulatory)Psychological interventionSepsisIntensive careBlood pressureSeptic shockCardiologyInternal medicineMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hemodynamic problems are common in neonatal intensive care. They occur in the context of incomplete myocardial and vascular development and in cardiovascular responses to interventions which are, as a result, limited and often uncertain and unpredictable. In this review, I outline the hemodynamic features of 4 neonatal conditions which often require intervention: (1) persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn, (2) cardiogenic shock (most commonly in the context of hypoxic ischemic injury), (3) sepsis and (4) low blood pressure in the transitional period of the extremely preterm infant. I also look at the evidence which exists for effective interventions and the most important research questions for the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeonatologySame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207