MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

INCREASED LEVELS OF APOPTOSIS AND P53 IN PARTIAL-THICKNESS SUPRASPINATUS TENDON TEARS

2013· article· en· W2139242669 on OpenAlexaff
Kirsten Lundgreen, Ø. Lian, Alex Scott, Lars Engebretsen

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Sports Medicine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRotator cuffTendonTendinopathyMedicineTearsApoptosisAnatomyPathologySurgeryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction The role of apoptosis in the progression of rotator cuff tendinopathy is poorly understood. The primary aim of this study was to quantify the amount of apoptosis in supraspinatus tendons presenting partial-thickness tears and matched intact subscapularis tendons. Methods 9 partially torn supraspinatus tendons and matched intact subscapularis tendons were biopsied and compared to 10 reference subscapularis tendon samples. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess apoptotic cells (activated caspase-3; Asp175), proliferation (Ki67) and p53 (M7001), a key protein involved in regulating cell death. The Bonar scale was used to evaluate tendon degeneration. Results The partially torn supraspinatus tendons and matched subscapularis tendons demonstrated a significant increase in the density of apoptotic cells and p53 expression. The Bonar score revealed significant tendon degeneration in the partially torn supraspinatus tendon compared to both matched and reference subscapularis tendon. The number of proliferating tendon cells was higher in the partially torn supraspinatus than in the matched or reference subscapularis tendons. Discussion The presence of increased apoptosis and p53 in partial-thickness tears of the supraspinatus tendon is accompanied by features of both degeneration as well as ongoing repair. Apoptosis may be a relatively early feature in the continuum of rotator cuff tendinopathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Sports MedicineSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207