MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139272539 · doi:10.4021/jem.v3i3.182

Vitamin D Levels in Overweight/Obese Adults With and Without Metabolic Syndrome

2013· article· en· W2139272539 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Savaş Karataş, Zeliha Hekimsoy, Gönül Dinç, Ece Onur, Bilgin Özmen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Endocrinology and Metabolism · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverweightMedicineMetabolic syndromeInternal medicineInsulin resistanceEndocrinologyVitamin D and neurologyObesityBody mass indexvitamin D deficiencyWaist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Vitamin D role is not only associated with mineral metabolism and bone health but also in globally important diseases such as obesity and metabolic syndrome. The aims of this observational study were to investigate: 1) 25(OH) vitamin D levels in overweight/obese persons with and without metabolic syndrome and compare these with levels in healthy subjects, 2) the relationship between serum 25(OH) vitamin D levels and metabolic syndrome components such as body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, lipid parameters and insulin resistance:Homeostasis Model Assesment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR). Methods: Participants (n = 287) were 94 overweight/obese adults with metabolic syndrome, 120 overweight/obese adults without metabolic syndrome, and 73 non-obese healthy subjects (controls). Overweight/obese subjects were classified as metabolic syndrome (MetS) positive according to the recent International Diabetes Federation criteria. HOMA-IR was calculated as serum glucose (mg/dL) × insulin level ( µ U/mL)/405. Vitamin D nutritional status was assessed as deficient if 25(OH) vitamin D levels were < 20 ng/mL, insufficient if greater than or equal to 20 - < 30 ng/mL, and sufficient if greater than or equal to 30 ng/mL. Results: Serum 25(OH) vitamin D deficiency, defined as a level < 20 ng/mL, was more common in overweight/obese adults with (72%) and without (69%) metabolic syndrome than in controls (49%) (P = 0.006). Serum 25(OH) vitamin D levels were significantly lower in overweight/obese metabolic syndrome adults (16.8 ± 7.3 ng/mL) and overweight/obese non-metabolic syndrome adults (18.3 ± 8.6 ng/mL) than healthy subjects (21.2 ± 8.9 ng/mL, P = 0.001). A negative relationship was found between serum 25(OH) vitamin D levels and body mass index (r = -0.159, P = 0.007) and serum triglyceride levels (r = -0.149, P = 0.012). Serum 25(OH) vitamin D levels correlated inversely (not statistically significant) to waist circumference, fasting blood glucose, HOMA-IR, and blood pressure, but positively (not statistically significant) to HDL cholesterol levels . Conclusions: Vitamin D deficiency is very common in overweight/obese adults, more so than in healthy controls. Vitamin D deficiency is not more common in those with metabolic syndrome than in those without. Reduced 25(OH) vitamin D levels are associated with an increased risk of overweight/obesity and metabolic syndrome. J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;3(3):47-56 doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/jem166e

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Endocrinology and MetabolismSame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207