MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139296249 · doi:10.1109/tia.2010.2070476

Modeling and Minimization of Speed Ripple of a Faulty Induction Motor With Broken Rotor Bars

2010· article· en· W2139296249 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Nasir Uddin, Wilson Wang, Zhi Rui Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Induction motorRippleRotor (electric)MinificationElectronic speed controlFault (geology)Vector controlComputer scienceRotational speedFuzzy logicConvergence (economics)EngineeringVoltageControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a technique of modeling and minimization of speed ripples of a vector-controlled faulty induction motor (IM) with broken rotor bars. First, the performance of the faulty IM is investigated in terms of speed ripples under the open-loop condition. Then, a new IM model is developed, incorporating the speed ripples. Consequently, a new neuro-fuzzy controller (NFC) is proposed to tolerate the fault effect under an indirect field-oriented control scheme. The proposed NFC can compensate the motor rotation imperfections by minimizing the supply frequency-related speed ripples instead of directly working on the low-frequency speed ripples exhibited by a faulty IM. A novel self-tuning algorithm is proposed to adjust the weight of the developed NFC, and its training convergence is investigated by simulation. The effectiveness of the developed NFC is verified by both simulation and experimental tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207