Left Ventricular Unloading in a Patient with End‐stage Cardiomyopathy and Medically Unresponsive Pulmonary Hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Severe, medically unresponsive pulmonary hypertension (PHT) is considered to be a contraindication for orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). Chronic left ventricular (LV) unloading using a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) might result in reversal of the elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), allowing successful OHT in such patients. In this study, we present a patient with end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy and fixed, elevated PVR (7.1 Wood units) who underwent implantation of a Novacor LVAD (Baxter Healthcare Corp., Deerfield, IL, U.S.A.), with a subsequent reduction in PVR to 1.2 Wood units and successful OHT eleven months post-LVAD implantation. Three years after heart transplant, the patient still leads an active life with no right heart failure. In conclusion, OHT is not contraindicated in patients with end-stage heart failure and medically unresponsive PHT in the presence of elevated left atrial pressure. Left ventricular unloading should be considered in these patients to allow reversal of the elevated PVR before OHT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".