MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139329444 · doi:10.1071/rdv20n1ab135

135 <i>IN VITRO</i> DEVELOPMENT OF <i>IN VIVO</i> PRODUCED EMBRYOS FROZEN AT MORULA OR BLASTOCYST STAGES

2007· article· en· W2139329444 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roberto Sartori, G. M. Machado, M. M. Guardieiro, M. R. Bastos, L. O. Leme, E. Siqueira Filho, R. Rumpf, Margot Alves Nunes Dode

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlastocystCryopreservationHatchingEmbryo cultureAndrologyEmbryoBiologyOviductEthylene glycolHuman fertilizationEstrous cycleEmbryogenesisAnimal scienceAnatomyChemistryMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was designed to compare cryotolerance between morulae and blastocysts collected from superovulated heifers. Twenty pubertal beef heifers (10 Nelore and 10 crossbred Nelore × Simmental) were superovulated with 100 mg of FSHp (Folltropin-V, Bioniche, Ontario, Canada), and embryos were collected and evaluated 7 days after estrus. Grades 1 and 2 embryos (IETS) were divided into four groups: morulae cryopreserved (MC) in liquid nitrogen ( n = 24); blastocysts cryopreserved (BC; n = 19); morulae fresh (MF; n = 23); and blastocysts fresh (BF; n = 18). For freezing, embryos were immersed in ethylene glycol (Ethylene Glycol Freeze Plus with 0.1 m sucrose, Bioniche, Pullman, WA, USA), and a standard protocol (cooling rate of –0.5°C/min) was used. Prior to in vitro culture, embryos were removed from nitrogen, kept at room temperature for 5 s, and put in a water bath at 30°C for 20 s. Within 5 h after recovery, thawed and fresh embryos were washed five times in holding solution (Holding Plus, Bioniche), transferred to synthetic oviduct fluid medium (SOF, Nutricell, Campinas, SP, Brazil), and cultured for 72 h. Embryos were evaluated at 48 and 72 h of culture. After the last evaluation, degenerate and non-hatched embryos were removed from culture, and the remaining embryos were measured by a graduated ocular coupled to the Motic Images Plus 2.0 program. Hatched blastocysts were kept in culture for an additional 48 h for post-hatching development assessment. For post-hatching culture PHD medium (Brandão DO et al . 2005 Biol. Reprod. 71, 2048–2055) was added into each well, to have a final composition of 50% SOF and 50% SOF PHD. At 120 h of culture (48 h of PHD culture) only morphologically normal blastocysts were measured. Comparison among groups was performed by ANOVA or chi-square test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. After 48 h of culture, hatching rate (%) was significantly lower in cryopreserved (MC = 8.3 and BC = 21.5) than in fresh (MF = 56.5 and BF = 77.8) embryos ( P < 0.05). However at 72 h, hatching rate was similar among BC (75.9), MF (78.3), and BF (88.9), being MC (41.7) still lower ( P < 0.05). The diameter (µm) of hatched embryos after 72 h of culture was 272.8 ± 27.1a ( n = 8), 320.6 ± 18.6ab ( n = 14), 385.3 ± 14.2c ( n = 17), and 378.0 ± 22.0bc ( n = 16) for MC, BC, MF, and BF, respectively (a–c P < 0.05). After 120 h of culture, the diameter of MC (379.0 ± 39.9; n = 8), although similar to BC (495.4 ± 59.6; n = 10), was smaller than MF (509.1 ± 36.5; n = 11) and BF (511.8 ± 41.2; n = 14). The results of this study with zebu cattle suggest that morulae are less resistant to cryopreservation in liquid nitrogen than blastocysts. Moreover, frozen/thawed embryos, when put in culture, present a slower development compared with fresh embryos. Financial support from CNPq and FAPESP from Brazil .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207