MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139345991 · doi:10.1021/jm500818a

Structure–Activity Relationship Studies and Discovery of a Potent Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid (TRPV1) Antagonist 4-[3-Chloro-5-[(1<i>S</i>)-1,2-dihydroxyethyl]-2-pyridyl]-<i>N</i>-[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridyl]-3,6-dihydro-2<i>H</i>-pyridine-1-carboxamide (V116517) as a Clinical Candidate for Pain Management

2014· article· en· W2139345991 on OpenAlexaff
Laykea Tafesse, Toshiyuki Kanemasa, Noriyuki Kurose, Jianming Yu, Toshiyuki Asaki, Gang Wu, Yuka Iwamoto, Yoshitaka Yamaguchi, Chiyou Ni, John F. Engel, Naoki Tsuno, Aniket Patel, Xiaoming Zhou, Takuya Shintani, Kevin Brown, Tsuyoshi Hasegawa, Manjunath S. Shet, Yasuyoshi Iso, Akira Kato, Donald J. Kyle

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicIon Channels and Receptors
Canadian institutionsPurdue Pharma (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTRPV1ChemistryCapsaicinAntagonistIn vivoPharmacokineticsPharmacologyTransient receptor potential channelIn vitroStereochemistryLead compoundChemical synthesisReceptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of novel tetrahydropyridinecarboxamide TRPV1 antagonists were prepared and evaluated in an effort to optimize properties of previously described lead compounds from piperazinecarboxamide series. The compounds were evaluated for their ability to block capsaicin and acid-induced calcium influx in CHO cells expressing human TRPV1. The most potent of these TRPV1 antagonists were further characterized in pharmacokinetic, efficacy, and body temperature studies. On the basis of its pharmacokinetic, in vivo efficacy, safety, and toxicological properties, compound 37 was selected for further evaluation in human clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medicinal ChemistrySame topicIon Channels and ReceptorsFrench-language works237,207