MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139358148 · doi:10.1080/08037050500233320

The association of hypertension and aortic valve sclerosis

2005· review· en· W2139358148 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Pressure · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineBlood pressureOdds ratioIncidence (geometry)Cross-sectional studyAortic valveAortic valve stenosisPopulationStenosisLeft ventricular hypertrophyCalcificationPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve sclerosis (AVS), a condition of thickening and calcification of the normal trileaflet aortic valve without the obstruction to left ventricular outflow, is likely the initial stage in the development of aortic stenosis and is associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular events. The objective of this study is to critically review the data on the association of blood pressure and hypertension with AVS. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE (to June 2004) was conducted using the keywords hypertension and aortic valve. All English language papers were examined if they dealt with hypertension and AVS. All studies were included for analysis if they had a control group. RESULTS: Three population-based, cross-sectional studies with a total sample size of 6450 individuals showed a consistent and significant relationship between hypertension and AVS with an odds ratio (OR) ranging from 1.23 to 1.74. Smaller case-control studies with a total sample size of 1609 individuals did not show consistent results but the OR ranged from 1.75 to 2.38. Only one small study (n = 188) showed fewer cases with hypertension and AVS than in the control group. Hypertension was a significant factor remaining in multivariate analysis after consideration of age and other risk factors in several cross-sectional studies. In contrast, other studies with blood pressure measurements consistently showed no increased blood pressures in the presence of AVS. However, these studies did not examine the prevalence of AVS within age-adjusted blood pressure levels. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional population-based studies present evidence of an association between hypertension and AVS with an OR between 1.23 and 1.74. The major limitation in establishing a causal relationship is the failure to demonstrate a gradient of risk between increasing blood pressure and increasing incidence of AVS. In addition, the literature is confounded by the wide variety of definitions for AVS as well as hypertension. At this time, further data is required to conclude that there is a causal relationship between AVS and elevated blood pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it