Étude descriptive des interventions individuelles et spontanées auprès des enfants et des adolescents exposés à la violence conjugale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente les résultats d’une recherche sur les pratiques d’intervention auprès des enfants exposés à la violence conjugale. Les données ont été recueillies dans 146 établissements et organismes (CLSC, centres jeunesse, maisons d’hébergement) oeuvrant dans le domaine de la violence. La plupart des interventions sont basées sur l’aide individuelle; elles se distinguent selon trois types : les pratiques féministes formelles, les pratiques féministes ponctuelles et les pratiques éclectiques/systémiques. Des interventions spontanées ont également été relevées dans desmaisons d’hébergement. Le portrait des pratiques d’intervention tracé soulève des questions sur la difficulté pour les intervenants d’évaluer les résultats de leur action, sur le peu de rayonnement des interventions auprès des adolescents et sur la place faite aux parents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.043 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".