MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139384435 · doi:10.7202/1024321ar

Perception de la responsabilité sociale des entreprises par leurs dirigeants

2014· article· fr· W2139384435 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Leïla Ben Hassine, Chiraz Ghozzi-Nékhili

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale P M E Économie et gestion de la petite et moyenne entreprise · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La responsabilité sociétale de l’entreprise (RSE) est aujourd’hui une réalité qui s’impose à tout type d’entreprise. Du fait du rôle dominant du dirigeant dans la prise de décision dans les petites et moyennes entreprises (PME), sa perception de la RSE constitue une source privilégiée de l’étude du concept. Partant de l’idée que la certification selon les normes internationales peut être un facteur distinctif de la perception de la RSE, nous avons mené une enquête exploratoire basée sur des études de cas multiples auprès de huit PME tunisiennes réparties en deux groupes : quatre certifiées selon les normes internationales (ISO 9001, ISO 14001, OHSAS, etc.) et quatre non certifiées. L’analyse des convergences et des divergences entre les perceptions des dirigeants de ces PME a montré une faible distinction entre les deux groupes quant à l’appropriation du concept de RSE et à l’identification des motivations et des freins à l’engagement de l’entreprise. D’autres facteurs émergents de cette étude sont liés à la conviction personnelle du dirigeant et à la culture nationale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.070
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.070
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale P M E Économie et gestion de la petite et moyenne entrepriseSame topicCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingFrench-language works237,207