MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139389745 · doi:10.1586/erc.12.170

Tetralogy of Fallot and aortic root disease

2013· review· en· W2139389745 on OpenAlexaff
Laurianne Le Gloan, François‐Pierre Mongeon, Lise‐Andrée Mercier, Annie Dore, François Marcotte, Réda Ibrahim, Anita Asgar, Joaquim Miró, Nancy Poirier, Paul Khairy

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTetralogy of FallotCardiologyHeart diseaseTetralogyInternal medicineAortic rootSurgeryAorta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tetralogy of Fallot is the most common form of cyanotic congenital heart disease and accounts for 10% of all congenital heart defects. Corrective surgery has dramatically improved long-term prognosis, with nearly 90% of patients now surviving well into adulthood. Aortic root dilation is a well-recognized feature of unrepaired tetralogy of Fallot, and is increasingly reported in patients, years after corrective surgery. While the prevalence and severity of aortic root dilation and its associated complications remain to be defined, a clearer portrait is emerging from the growing body of literature. The objective of this contemporary review is to address the scope of the problem regarding aortic dilation in tetralogy of Fallot, explore potential pathophysiological mechanisms, summarize current knowledge regarding adverse events and discuss potential therapeutic options.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.006
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Cardiovascular TherapySame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207